At the fourth meeting for the development of a strategic plan for Callan Services, Papua New Guinea, I asked the group to reflect on the journey so far. We had just named the strategic directions at this meeting. My question was – ‘What image, colour, sound would you give to what has been happening?” Great images were shared, but one in particular seemed to speak to me about the people here and ToP processes.
Said one participant: ‘We are familiar with the leader out in the front and we are all in a line behind. He is pointing ahead and telling us that is the way but during these months we sit in circles and someone asks, what is the way?’
Callan Services has been operating in Papua New Guinea for over 25 years. A Christian Brother, Br Graeme, from Australia had been the driving force behind the establishment of this organisation.
Its core work is in education and training for teachers and workers in the field to ensure inclusive education for all, especially the hearing and vision impaired. Many specialist medical services are needed too, so it is doing much in that area as well. It has 17 regional centres with several sub-centres each. These resource centres are owned by the local diocese and governed by a local board. It is a structurally complex organisation operating in a geographically challenging country with mountains and rivers that makes connections very difficult.
Within PNG, Callan has an amazing reputation for contributing to changes in government policy in relation to education and people with disability, as well as being a positive force for people with disability. It is connected to thousands of people.
At the end of 2008, the founding director retired. Another Christian Brother, Kevin, has become the director. He invited me to work with Callan Services to develop a strategic plan. Here began a fantastic journey for me, one that has given me energy and inspiration into how effective the ToP methods can be in the Melanesian culture as well as a great way of training and building the capacity of people. I have just completed my fourth visit, working for four days each time, with at least one more visit planned this year.
We began in January 2009, a few weeks after the faculty event in Brisbane. I had previously done some work in PNG with another group using the methods, so I had confidence that ToP processes were appropriate here. My role was two-fold, facilitation and training. These had a few steps: to facilitate initial planning to manage the change process for the first six months, to facilitate the development of a strategic plan and to train people in key roles in the methods. All my favourite tasks!
I would like to share with you the steps in this process as I think it will give a picture into a
|
|
wonderful people and place. In January 2009 we gathered. The ‘we’ was the retiring director, the new director and one other man who was the national coordinator of the Hearing Project across PNG. Another person was to come but he was stuck in Hagen and we were in Wewak. We had a small room in which we worked (the only place on the campus with air-conditioning, well, sort of). The room is one sticky wall wide and one sticky wall and a door way long, all walls covered with book cases and books. Until this time, only the director had been involved in strategic planning. Our themes for these days were, learning from the past, living in the present and thinking into the future.
We began with a focused conversation to form the group and then moved to a historical scan. The image emerging from this was a journey, and taking a journey in this country is very difficult venture. After listing and naming the current issues, concerns and demands that had to be met we developed a change map. This was a great exercise, as the PNG man really came to the fore with his images, drawings and stories. We then developed an action plan for the next few months, as this was such a critical time they were unable to look too far into the future, just make sure they survived and did all that needed to be done to manage the transition time. Finally, I shared with the group the process of the focused conversation, as we had done many conversations throughout our two and a half days, and then we prepared one. The director was going to interview every staff member so we developed the conversation for this action.
In February I returned. Since the last meeting the two members of the initial meeting had shared the historical scan with the staff at Wewak and they had added their ideas. The
director had conversations with each staff member using the focused conversation prepared and in particular shared in more depth what we had done in our meeting with two people who joined us at the February meeting. This group is now named as the executive team for Callan Services National Unit, extending the decision making group from the initial one to four
|
Any room will do |
This second meeting began with a review of the action plan developed in January and identifying those actions that needed a specific action plan developed in order to move them forward. I unpacked the action planning process with the group and they each developed an action plan for some project that they needed to undertake in the next period of time. We began to critique the overall strategic planning process that I was proposing and refined it. One particular aspect was identified as a gap before we could commence the planning. The mission statement, or The Statement of Purpose, as they call it, was not up-to-date. So we |